Chelsea Handler/Padma Lakshmi/Eliza Dushku Photos in Allure, Sexist?

For those who feel the need:

Chelsea Handler/Padma Lakshmi/Eliza Dushku Photos in Allure, Sexist?
source

Oh, tastefully nude national magazine photo shoots, how you vex us. Sometimes you boldly declare that a former child star is passed puberty, sometimes you are just trying to be funny, and sometimes, most vexing of all, you aim to "empower" us. The latter, which is what Allure's annual naked issue strives to be, brings up complicated feelings for us ladies. (And it's primarily ladies who are the subjects of such things, unless you count famous beefcake shots of Burt Reynolds or Richard Gere as empowering, which you could.)

Celebrating women's unadorned bodies? Genuinely awesome. (Especially these days, when most of us lack the funding for the designer threads normally featured in women's mag pages.) But Allure seems to have airbrushed the likes of Padma Lakshmi, Chelsea Handler, and Eliza Dushku "like a Playboy spread," as one of my astute straight male colleagues observed. Not to mention that there's something, well, confusing about how proud we're supposed to be that the freakishly attractive people we call celebrities, who have trainers and possibly other body-oriented professionals on speed dial, are proud of their toned flesh. (And how they provocatively coo to the female readership, via Q&As, that they sleep naked, are "sensual" beings, etc., in a way that's about half a step from being a Maxim interview)...

Chelsea Handler/Padma Lakshmi/Eliza Dushku Photos in Allure, Sexist?