|
| ||
December 20, 2009Virginia Naked Trial
Are you allowed to be naked in your own home? Most Americans might take for granted the answer is yes, but one case of a man arrested for indecent exposure inside his own house may set a different precedent. The man was in his own kitchen minding his own business, when a woman and her young son were walking across his front yard and saw him in the nude. Which to me raises the question: why were they in his yard? But for the woman it raised the question "why is that guy naked" so she called the police who came and arrested him for being naked in his own kitchen. Is this right? I've got to hope his lawyers can prove this is a miscarriage of justice, because it seems wrong to me. Virginia Naked Trial daily newsPosted at December 20, 2009 3:19 AM Comments
Isn't that called being a peeping tom? Posted by: baffled at December 20, 2009 3:46 AM That's pretty weird that she took her son into his yard? I think that should be raised as a question... so should why were they looking in his window? Were they looking for something particular? Posted by: Emma at December 20, 2009 3:50 AM thats funny she was checking him out what a perv she is Posted by: joe at December 20, 2009 3:59 AM I agree with "baffled". The police arrested the wrong person. Seems like the woman should have been arrested for trespassing and peeping. Now if she had been on a public sidewalk, street, or something it might have been different. Posted by: Phil at December 20, 2009 4:05 AM the police arrested the wrong person they should lock her up for peeping and trespassing things like that really piss me off seems like any the goverment can stick in to little man it will lock her ass up if she walked in my yard she would shot for trespassing thats just wrong going to jail for being naked in your own home what next going to jail for having a beer in your home when watching monday night football Posted by: charlie at December 20, 2009 4:32 AM Next will be private drunkeness. Posted by: joe at December 20, 2009 4:41 AM Whats next? Having sex with your partner, in your own home? I like variety;livingroom,bathroom,kitchen,....not gonna tell me when, where and how! Posted by: Karen at December 20, 2009 4:50 AM This is ridiculous! Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 5:19 AM This is ridiculous! Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 5:20 AM God this chick is an idiot. She could technically be charged for trespassing and being a peeping tom. What a stupid bitch. She is the one that should be in handcuffs. I hate stupid people and it gets worse and worse every day. This is so ridiculous she should be deported and forced to watch naked men parade around her for the rest of her life, stupid bitch. Posted by: Stupid woman Hater at December 20, 2009 5:29 AM God this chick is an idiot. She could technically be charged for trespassing and being a peeping tom. What a stupid bitch. She is the one that should be in handcuffs. I hate stupid people and it gets worse and worse every day. This is so ridiculous she should be deported and forced to watch naked men parade around her for the rest of her life, stupid bitch. Posted by: Stupid woman Hater at December 20, 2009 5:30 AM God this chick is an idiot. She could technically be charged for trespassing and being a peeping tom. What a stupid bitch. She is the one that should be in handcuffs. I hate stupid people and it gets worse and worse every day. This is so ridiculous she should be deported and forced to watch naked men parade around her for the rest of her life, stupid bitch. Posted by: Stupid woman Hater at December 20, 2009 5:30 AM You have got to be kidding...I think this woman is a nut case! She should be arrested for being a pervert...too bad he didn't notice her checking him out...he could have flashed her a moon and given her a great show! Are the authorities ever going to have common sense...I just can't stand it anymore. Posted by: Abby at December 20, 2009 5:35 AM You have got to be kidding...I think this woman is a nut case! She should be arrested for being a pervert...too bad he didn't notice her checking him out...he could have flashed her a moon and given her a great show! Are the authorities ever going to have common sense...I just can't stand it anymore. Posted by: Abby at December 20, 2009 5:37 AM Phil has the key point here: Could he be seen from a public area, such as the sidewalk or the street? If he could be seen with no effort from outside his yard, then, yes, it would be indecent exposure. If that particular window through which they saw him wasn't facing such a public area or if his drapes were drawn and they made an effort to look through any partition, then the mother and her son violated his privacy. On the surface, it sounds very ridiculous (nuts, even just below the surface it does, too), but to judge it fairly we need not only the physical layout of the "crime" and a very justifiable reason why the mother and her son were on his property. Posted by: Jon at December 20, 2009 5:37 AM I don't know about VA, but in PA a person cannot be charged with trespassing unless they were first told that they are not allowed on your property. At least that's what I was told. So it's possible she CAN'T be charged with trespassing. Posted by: Kaye at December 20, 2009 5:48 AM I agree she should be the one arrested as he was in his own home. How stupid can the police be? Posted by: Joe at December 20, 2009 5:59 AM This is another example of Big Brother sticking their nose in where it doesnt belong. The question is not are we giving up our freedoms but how much have we already given up! This man was in his home. It appears he was wrongly arrested and charged and if I were on this jury he would without a doubt be found innocent. thanks Posted by: Jim Kelton at December 20, 2009 6:04 AM You must be crazy,what happen to PRIVCY in the world Posted by: Rich at December 20, 2009 6:06 AM I don't know about the rest of you, but I was born naked and all the nurses and doctors saw me naked, arrest them, arrest them! Posted by: Wurst1 at December 20, 2009 6:42 AM I think the police were in error. Since when is it a crime to be nude in your own home when you are alone. She definitely was tresspassing if she was on HIS property looking in HIS window. Here is another example of taxpapers money being wasted....I suggest the police look at the error in judgement they made and apologize to this man. Posted by: Marie at December 20, 2009 7:03 AM Soooooo...I guess this means I have to take a shower with my clothes on? Wouldn,t want any one seeing me in there you know!!!! Hmmmm and by the way, me being the man I am.....what the heck were they doing looking through my window? I sure wouldn't do that to them...invasion of privacy by my thinking, not to mention they WERE on his property. I have a normal front yard and if I was eating in the buff, no one could see a thing....besides I would be the one embarrased if I was on someones property and saw something I should not have....great....teach your kids to trespass and then attack the property owner....gotta love the backwards mentality taught to our children.....she should be repremanded, the gentlman should be allowed to finish his breakfast as he pleases (thought that was why I bought my own house anyway) and the child should be tought the Law, as his parent dosn't seem to have PROPER manners....The state of things is apparent in this country....so we do so do our children do to a greater degree.... Posted by: Michael Wright at December 20, 2009 7:04 AM I shower in the nude. Is that a problem? Posted by: Rod at December 20, 2009 7:11 AM So next week we arrest the plumber for showing his crack while working for indecet exposure.Again what ever happened to common since? People mind your own business. Are we stupid that next time someone will be arrested for peeing at Walmart in the bathroom. WAKE UP STUPIDS, THINK, IF THAT CAN BE DONE ANYMORE HERE IN THE US OF ASS&%$#*!! Posted by: mike robinson at December 20, 2009 7:13 AM I agree with most of the people who have written in,she and her son should have taken a different path, or mined her own business when she walked through HIS yard. Its not like he was shakeing his unit at her and him drinking acup of joe.This is a good example of police takeing the wrong person to the gray bar hotel.happens every dam day,sad but true. Posted by: johnny at December 20, 2009 7:30 AM aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh INSANE Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 7:43 AM A few people hit on the real issue. It's not a question of whether the woman is nuts or knows what she's doing, nor a question of whether the man was in the wrong. It's a question of whether the authorities have any brains anymore (or not). At the last, the question of who gets hauled off to the local precinct was for the police to decide, and they apparently got it wrong. The government is evermore intrusive in our private lives, and the intrusiveness is more and more completely against the grain of any common sense or logic. But then Mark Twain got it right when he said every population gets the government they deserve (the one they voted for). Posted by: Stan at December 20, 2009 7:45 AM One point that we may be missing is that most kitchens are in the back of a house.So was this woman in his back yard. HUMMM Posted by: Joe at December 20, 2009 7:50 AM
Posted by: Ndapandula at December 20, 2009 7:52 AM maybe this was a daily thing with this man, and Miss lookielu knew this. Thats why she went by each morning. In HIS YARD to get a better look. Posted by: Doggsledracer at December 20, 2009 8:08 AM Yes she should be listed as a peeping tom but a little judgement of keeping the blinds or curtain closed could have kelp this from happening in thr first place. i say they are both wrong in this case. Posted by: badboyme at December 20, 2009 8:28 AM If big brother is going to try this, I suggest he bring along some company. I will be damned if he will get to me with out a fight, my house, if I want to walk around naked, by god I will Posted by: Dean at December 20, 2009 8:33 AM The scary thing in this case is the government intruding on someone's Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in their own home. The woman was an idiot, clearly. You don't look into the windows of someone's home-that's rude. If you don't like what you see, don't look. Posted by: Violet Charmer at December 20, 2009 8:35 AM Isn't this just a great country to live in? You can't breath, fart or turn your head without someone feeling offended or discriminated against.There is nothing wrong with nudity.Ilove it. this country is full of crap like her & it is only gonna get worse.I'll bet the judge finds HIM guilty too (way to go u.s.a ) Land of the FREE! I don't think so.
Posted by: stuart at December 20, 2009 8:36 AM Privacy? what's that? Big brother and the pervs are watching you!You want privacy,paint your windows black. Posted by: gary at December 20, 2009 8:45 AM WEll YES we CAN...OUR home is our CASTLE we pay enough DAMN taxes. and the RECENT affair of the NEWS women BEING NAKED in her HOTEL room SHE WAS not arrested, the PERP who was video taping her was... SO to me this LADY and BOY whom WAS TRESPASSING anyway,, should be the ones ARRESTED.. thats the LAW.... TRESPASSING and VOYERISM.. is Definetly against the LAW.. .ARREST THE PERPS... NOT the ONE whom was on their own PROPERTY...... or VIRGINA would you like a CROWD of 200,000 protesters to come into the small town..... WE WILL.... we are tired of the LAW being twisted it is what it is ... and the LADY IS THE ONE WHOM BROKE THE LAW....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: Tom at December 20, 2009 8:48 AM I did not see any facts in any of these articles to support the comments. Walking accross the front usually means on the sidewalk or road in front of the house. The Window? Bay that exposed all of the gentleman or neck high at which no one would have seen anything. Was he attempting to attract attention to himself by exposing himself or was he an innocent victim. Don't jump to conclusions GET THE FACTS. You are the reason this country is in the mess its in... Posted by: tom sanders at December 20, 2009 8:48 AM I did not see any facts in any of these articles to support the comments. Walking accross the front usually means on the sidewalk or road in front of the house. The Window? Bay that exposed all of the gentleman or neck high at which no one would have seen anything. Was he attempting to attract attention to himself by exposing himself or was he an innocent victim. Don't jump to conclusions GET THE FACTS. You are the reason this country is in the mess its in... Posted by: tom sanders at December 20, 2009 8:50 AM I did not see any facts in any of these articles to support the comments. Walking accross the front usually means on the sidewalk or road in front of the house. The Window? Bay that exposed all of the gentleman or neck high at which no one would have seen anything. Was he attempting to attract attention to himself by exposing himself or was he an innocent victim. Don't jump to conclusions GET THE FACTS. You are the reason this country is in the mess its in... Posted by: tom sanders at December 20, 2009 8:51 AM I did not see any facts in any of these articles to support the comments. Walking accross the front usually means on the sidewalk or road in front of the house. The Window? Bay that exposed all of the gentleman or neck high at which no one would have seen anything. Was he attempting to attract attention to himself by exposing himself or was he an innocent victim. Don't jump to conclusions GET THE FACTS. You are the reason this country is in the mess its in... Posted by: tom sanders at December 20, 2009 8:51 AM Arrest the silly bitch for trespassing. I was a cop for 27 years, and I never would have made the arrest. Posted by: Ramesh Nyberg at December 20, 2009 8:56 AM This reminds me of a lady who called in an indecent exposure to the police. When they arrived they asked where the indecent exp was. She told them next door. They said you cant see in their house. Yes you can if you stand on this stool and look thru the window Posted by: Brent at December 20, 2009 8:58 AM if at had been a man crossing the yard and it was a naked lady in the house ,the man would have gone to jail for being a pepping tom. what happen to equal Justice? Posted by: clarence henderson at December 20, 2009 8:58 AM I am disappointed in the level of comment without fact. No fact base has been displayed and you can not make a decision without facts. Was the man an attractive nusance as defined by the law. Was he deliberately exposing himself in a window he knew would allow any passer by to see him in the nude and therefore be offensive as defined by the law (Which has been around for over 75 to 100 years). You also need a definition as to what walking in front means. Usually it is defined as walking along the sidewalk or in the road fronting the property. You are losing America day by day and you waste your time on this drivel. Learn about your govt. and the law and its real effect on you not your percieved foolishness from some comic book or a friend who knows even less than you do. NO FACT NO DECISION NO OPINION worth listening to or reading... God bless whats left of America. Posted by: Tom Summers at December 20, 2009 8:59 AM I am disappointed in the level of comment without fact. No fact base has been displayed and you can not make a decision without facts. Was the man an attractive nusance as defined by the law. Was he deliberately exposing himself in a window he knew would allow any passer by to see him in the nude and therefore be offensive as defined by the law (Which has been around for over 75 to 100 years). You also need a definition as to what walking in front means. Usually it is defined as walking along the sidewalk or in the road fronting the property. You are losing America day by day and you waste your time on this drivel. Learn about your govt. and the law and its real effect on you not your percieved foolishness from some comic book or a friend who knows even less than you do. NO FACT NO DECISION NO OPINION worth listening to or reading... God bless whats left of America. Posted by: Tom Summers at December 20, 2009 8:59 AM yes i do agree we do not have all the facts on this matter . But still a little judgement on everyone in this matter could have made this to never happen. so i am not taking sides. but with what i have to go on at this time i still say the are both wrong. we and that means me also are so fast to point fingers that i myself need to be more careful at what i do. sorry to insult anyone . i will not say anymore on this matter. Posted by: badboyme at December 20, 2009 9:01 AM what ALL of you seem to forget is that Posted by: free man - ah ha ha ha ha ha at December 20, 2009 9:05 AM Now I can see if he was standing nude in front of a bay window flexing is muscles, doing lewd poses and making eye contact with people passing by as indecent exposure. But if he was just walking nude in his home and merely forgot to close the drapes then he's innocent. And why was the woman looking in people's windows in the first place? I mean I can understand glancing at houses, I do, just to admire the building or laugh at it but I won't 'look' inside. And the poor guy lost his job over the incident and has a five year old himself, I sympathize with him I do the way the economy is and that three million Americans are unemployed. I hope he wins the appeal, gets his job back and just let the matter drop so we can all go back to our nude lives. Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 9:07 AM where are the human rights activist, ACLU,liberals,greens,enviromentalist conservationist earth lovers etc. I am sure the police just want to waste government money on this flimsy act. The woman should be arrested for trespassing on a private property and for exposing his son to watch a naked man in his kitchen. the woman and the police should be made to apologise to the mann. I am ready to give a $1000 to cover the cost of hiring an attorney and then sue afterward. I am sick and appalled. Posted by: yaw anane at December 20, 2009 9:07 AM God Bless America ! Posted by: Frenchie at December 20, 2009 9:16 AM I don't know about ya'll but can't you people see that the Government is getting control over everything we do. If you don't believe me watch Conspirecy Theory. Jesse Ventura tells it like it is!! Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 9:17 AM Tom, could you post that one more time! I don't think I got it the first 4... If that was a man calling the police on a naked woman he saw, he would either be a peeping tom or he likes the opposite sex. I can't believe the crap that goes on I wonder if she has ever been naked in her own house? Doesn't that really sound perverted or ridiculous now? Posted by: gene at December 20, 2009 9:19 AM He's lucky he wasn't cleaning or polishing/working on a gun or something like that. He might have found his door getting kicked in by the New World Order goons. Posted by: C. Heston at December 20, 2009 9:24 AM The question should be why would the police take the time out to answer the call. Was it another woman(police) who came and arrested him. Did she evenlet him put somthing on befor she took him to jail to have proof that he committed a crime. Posted by: donna at December 20, 2009 9:26 AM You have to look for more than a split second to really know if someone is naked, and she had to be pretty close to that window. I think they arrested the wrong person here. I walk around my house naked all the time. Are they going to get me next? No one better be looking in my windows either! Posted by: Michelle L. at December 20, 2009 9:30 AM Now please don't tell me that he lost his job.... It's not about the government.. It's the people that make the laws and we let our courts enforce them. If you don't like the laws, If I lost my job over this, she would be paying through her nose. Sue the nosy woman! Aren't you just proud of yourself now.. Posted by: gene at December 20, 2009 9:30 AM HO HO HO Merry Christmas!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 9:35 AM urban legend been going around for 40-50yr Posted by: cecil at December 20, 2009 9:37 AM If the woman was offended all she had to do was close her eyes. He had a right to be nude if he wanted to in his own home. I'm 73 and I walk around nude in my home also. It is a natural state of being. If anyone doesn't like it they don't have to look. She was a peeping tom who had no business in that mans yard. Posted by: Carol Young at December 20, 2009 9:47 AM If the woman was offended all she had to do was close her eyes. He had a right to be nude if he wanted to in his own home. I'm 73 and I walk around nude in my home also. It is a natural state of being. If anyone doesn't like it they don't have to look. She was a peeping tom who had no business in that mans yard. Posted by: Carol Young at December 20, 2009 9:47 AM If the woman was offended all she had to do was close her eyes. He had a right to be nude if he wanted to in his own home. I'm 73 and I walk around nude in my home also. It is a natural state of being. If anyone doesn't like it they don't have to look. She was a peeping tom who had no business in that mans yard. Posted by: Carol Young at December 20, 2009 9:48 AM When you do run across something like this, the polite thing to do is look away. Why would she draw attention to someone in their own home? Why did she not divert the child's attention as well? bad parenting, and poor judgment... Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 9:48 AM Can you name all of the items wrong in this situation? He has the right to be naked in his home. She doesn't have the right to come on his property. I hope justice uses common sense and prevails this time. Posted by: Anita at December 20, 2009 9:53 AM You know... if this was the other way around.. woman inside naked.. guy outside calling it in... the guy would have been aressted for being a peeping tom. its bias is all it is... and hey... thats why we keep our blinds closed. lol Posted by: JCM at December 20, 2009 9:53 AM The lady should be arrested for being a peeping tom and she should have to serve a 6 month house arrest sentance in the nude. Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 9:54 AM Do we shower with our clothes on? Is that what cops do? Posted by: Micko at December 20, 2009 9:58 AM Shower Shortz, for the man who has nothing to hide, but still wants to! Posted by: Jay at December 20, 2009 10:02 AM To Tom Summers Listen Tom, Facts are and facts will be noted. The woman and child shouldn't have been even looking in the window period. Fact is the man was in his own home. You better get it right Tom. Those of you better start taking action now to keep your right to freedom before it is to late Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 10:06 AM you dont just go looking in other peoples houses windows. i guess we need to abolish the term "privacy of your own home." Posted by: Aaron at December 20, 2009 10:06 AM If the situation would have been reversed - the man into a home with a naked woman inside. I betcha the man would have been charged. Posted by: Oscar at December 20, 2009 10:15 AM Only in America! Wow, what's this country coming to? Posted by: Jamey at December 20, 2009 10:18 AM Here is the question I have, If it had been a man taking the same path through the yard walking with his son and the person in the house was a woman in the nude, eating breakfast in her kitchen and the man calls the police and reports it. WHO do you think they would have arrested? Posted by: Ace at December 20, 2009 10:22 AM This is dangerous. When people can no longer be comfortable being themselves in the privacy of their own homes what comes next? Wake up America.... Posted by: DH at December 20, 2009 10:27 AM A man would have been arrested as a peeping tom Posted by: bob at December 20, 2009 10:32 AM Posted by: Jon at December 20, 2009 5:37 AM if his drapes were drawn and they made an effort to look through any partition, then the mother and her son violated his privacy. THE SIMPLE FACT THAT THEY HAD TO LOOK THRU A WINDOW MEANS THERE WAS SOME SORT OF EFFORT TO SEE. IT WAS A VIOLATION OF PRIVACY FOR THE MAN, DOESN'T MATTER IF SHE WAS ON A SIDEWALK OR ON HIS LAWN. AND IF THAT BITCH WAS ON MY LAWN HARPING ABOUT SOMETHING YES THE FUCKING BITCH WOULD HAVE BEEN SHOT. Posted by: alex at December 20, 2009 10:36 AM I think she went back- just 1 more time,without the kid, to make sure she could ID the guy- -before she called the cops. Posted by: tony graceffo at December 20, 2009 10:36 AM NOT enough facts given to support all the comments here. Do the 2 adults have a running feud? Could any kids on the sidewalk out front see in? Since this happened in Virginia they're probably both trailer trash anyway, thus no curtains, thus idiot local cops who'll arrest anybody their bible-thumping, prude sister-in-law doesn't like. Oh, am I jumping to conclusions without any facts? Posted by: MarkusDemetrius at December 20, 2009 10:42 AM This guy was minding his own business in his own house. A question brought to life, by several others is why in hell was she in his front yard? Its his right to run around butt ass naked in his own house if he wants to. Isn't he the one who pays the rent/mortgage? Posted by: Carl at December 20, 2009 10:49 AM What a waste of skin and air she is!! Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 10:51 AM Only in America! Posted by: Arnold at December 20, 2009 10:56 AM she should be arrested for trespassing Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 11:01 AM I have sex without clothes on...is that bad? Next time she or any of her family members get nekkid in her house she needs to call police on herself or them. SO THERE.... Posted by: Sonny at December 20, 2009 11:01 AM If he was in his front yard sun tanning in the buff, it would be indecent exposure.If he was inside his house,in the buff, without the blinds drawn,it would be indecent exposure. Merry Christmas Posted by: Greg Tronson at December 20, 2009 11:03 AM Virginia. eh?? That explains it! Posted by: HGD at December 20, 2009 11:03 AM Land of the FREE? Pfft, not anymore. -_- Posted by: Bunni at December 20, 2009 11:04 AM why Oh why does everything in o0ur world have to come to this! getting arrested!!! how bizarre. Is the guy going to counter sue her for being in his yard. Posted by: karen at December 20, 2009 11:05 AM how stupid. being nude is not a crime in your own home. He was not commiting a sexual act and he was not attempting to expose himself to the neighboors. I walk around my house nude too! Posted by: gonzalez-kurzy at December 20, 2009 11:09 AM If it were the other way around, he would be a PEEPING TOM and get arrested.... WHASSSSUP ????? Posted by: CRAZY-Loon at December 20, 2009 11:14 AM Having someone arrested in their OWN home for being naked is beyond ridiculous, the person who should be arrested is that imbecile of a woman who called the police. Not only did she violate the man's rights by peeping inside his home but as the other posters state she was trespassing on his property! What is she teaching her child? Posted by: Mike at December 20, 2009 11:15 AM i think Tom and Markus said it right...its all about the facts.. Posted by: Driver at December 20, 2009 11:16 AM And how much is this litigation going to cost the taxpayers? The prosecuter should pay for this out of his salery and then the complaining witness should be charged for trespass and a half dozen other violations I can think of. Posted by: lowtide at December 20, 2009 11:19 AM I saw the news report on Fox when this guy was first arrested. He said that for her and her son to see him nude, they had to be on his property. Can't believe he was actually convicted, on second thought, yes, I can !!!!! Big brother gets bigger every day !!!!! George Orwell's 1984 is fast become a reality. The scary part is that it is happening in our country not Russia !!!!It is no wonder there arer so many american ex-patriot's!! More and more, I think I might be joining them !!!!!!! Posted by: Bill R at December 20, 2009 11:23 AM Although there have been many good points raised, I still think that people are missing the biggest issue. How has our society gotten to the point where being nude even in the absense of any overt sexuality is considered criminal. Even from the childs perspective if the woman does not make a big issue of it, all he sees is a man the way God made him. If her son has an issue with it at all and he probably doesn't, it will be because of her reaction rather than something the he saw. Frankly what I think is disfunctional is when children never see a naked adult and are taught that the human body is "bad". Children should be taught the the human body is not bad it is natural, and that being naked is not the same as being sexual. Or to put it another way I would rather have them see a naked man eating breakfast than a fully clothed woman "Freak" dancing. Posted by: Victor at December 20, 2009 11:28 AM That's crazy. That lady should have been arrested as a "peeping tom". What was she doing in his front yard? I hope he gets a good lawyer. Posted by: Stan at December 20, 2009 11:30 AM That's crazy. That lady should have been arrested as a "peeping tom". What was she doing in his front yard? I hope he gets a good lawyer. Posted by: Stan at December 20, 2009 11:31 AM One thing most of the stories don't tell you is that Her husband is a cop. She called him first, not 911. Posted by: Brenda M at December 20, 2009 11:32 AM This is crazy she has no right to be in his yard looking in his windows and then calling the police on him. her just being noisy then triing to make something wrong with him when she is the one in the wrong. i bet though if she saw a crime in public or someone had a gun she woouldnt mention anything she wouldnt want to get involved. thinking shes being a good nieghbor and shes just being a noisy person Posted by: charles kincaid at December 20, 2009 11:38 AM If this was a man in the front yard watching the woman in the nude making coffee....I wonder who would have been arrested in that case? Posted by: TJ at December 20, 2009 11:41 AM Hopefully they will only charge him with a misda-weener!! Posted by: Mark at December 20, 2009 11:47 AM Many so called facts are vague BUT with what I can read myself, her neurotic reaction was uncalled for. There are many other things out there that are more offensive to me. For example, men wearing their jeans off their @## showing their butt and pubic hair, large obese females wearing short wife beaters with their boobs flopping out in the breeze and speedos 3 sizes too small with "Baby Phat" wmblazoned on the A**, etc etc etc. Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 11:48 AM Oh come on now. We all know the real story here, the woman saw him, liked what she saw, went in for a closer look and then in fear that her son would tell his Dad she was gawking at the sexy naked neighbor she diverted marital discord by making a report to her hubby - a COP! Had she been alone she would have peeped, got her jollies and not said a word. Why else would she have cut through this particular man's yard but in the hope of seeing him? She likely just didn't think he'd be naked - maybe she thought she'd get a peek at him in his undies. Either way she is in the wrong. She should have walked on and minded her own business not his. Posted by: Jaly at December 20, 2009 12:04 PM Sadly ridiculous...So, just how is love making supposed to take place? I don't think fully clothed is going to cut it. Posted by: xian at December 20, 2009 12:18 PM What is next no sex in your own home you have to be naked for that Posted by: John at December 20, 2009 12:18 PM This kind of boyscout gringo stuff only happens in the US. Other countries would not waste their time, what was SHE doing. Nice excuse bringing her son. A dog works too. Having a look, Nope just walkin the dog. Posted by: john at December 20, 2009 12:19 PM This is stupid. With everything going on in the world VA needs to worry about what a guy is doing in his own home. I could see if he was running around the streets, what the heck is she doing peeping in his windows? With her son no less. The police should have some questions for her... but then again since they arrested him they aren't smart enough to be asking any questions. I would suggest that someone investigate that police dept. cause you have to pass some tests to be a cop. Maybe someone is fudging test scores???? Posted by: Kim at December 20, 2009 12:21 PM exactly these two people were indeed trespassing and being a peeping tom which are both wrong and illegal and have to be prosecuted acorrdingly pronto! then the homeowner must file a countersuit against the local police,the state,and finnally the supreme court,we must protect our rights now!!!!!!!!. oh yeah bring on the 200,000 protesters!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 12:23 PM Yall are nuts, granted we don't have all the facts, but if he can be seen from the front of the house what is the difference of him being in the house or outside in his front yard. If he would have kept his blinds down it wouldn't be an issue. I know I don't want to be walking down the street with my daughter and see a naked guy whether it is in his house or not if he can be seen then it should be considered in the public. If he was a pedifile yall would be singing a different tune wouldn't you. Posted by: common sense at December 20, 2009 12:32 PM The headline to this story is not accurate. The man was NOT simply walking around his own home naked. He was purposely putting himself in position to expose himself to people outside his home. C'mon folks, I know our society is tanking but you don't have a right to PURPOSELY expose yourself to others (outside your home) whether you are inside or outside your home. There's no Kings X that says "I'm in my house so I can flash you all I want". The guy got what was coming to him. He should have been arrested and prosecuted. Police DO know the law and did the right thing in this case so stop blaming them. The idiot man is the one that was wrong and he has to suffer the consequences. Lord knows we don't hold anyone accountable for anything any more. Easier to just blame police. Wake up! Posted by: Jayson at December 20, 2009 12:34 PM the bitch should be arrested for tresspassing and for being a peppingtom,if that would have been me .they would have taken me to jail,and arrested.what the hell are you doing in the mans yard,bitch get a life,get laid but leave other people alone .you fucking bitch!!!!! Posted by: reo at December 20, 2009 12:37 PM Like the story said the man was minding his own business, the day I can't make breakfast naked is the day I lose faith in humanity. And why was the lady not minding her own buisness anyway? Posted by: Patrick at December 20, 2009 12:45 PM Regardless of the trespass issue, you can be nude in your own home as long as anybody cannot see you through a window. Posted by: Mike at December 20, 2009 12:56 PM Do you think she knows this guy? Perhaps a squabble between lovers and she was getting a little revenge? I mean it just doesn't make any sense to me. I clean my bedroom in the buff all the time. Why in the world would anyone arrest me for that??? Posted by: anonymous chick at December 20, 2009 12:56 PM typical example of a brainless police officer, he should be sued for being stupid Posted by: tom smith at December 20, 2009 1:04 PM It is only legal trespass if the person has been told not to be on the property, or if the lot lines and corners are legally posted. Anyway, what ever happened to just looking the other way and forgetting about it? Next time don't look in other peoples windows. Posted by: Dman at December 20, 2009 1:13 PM I don't know all the facts, but I'll go along with "Minding your own damn business." Like those folks who don't want Playboy sold in stores. If you don't want to see it, don't look. Nobody forced you to. Posted by: randy bauer at December 20, 2009 1:26 PM It sounds more like she was invading his privacy to me, and the fact that he went to jail is by far the most BS. She must have really been looking hard to see that if you ask me. So i guess we can't get out of the shower and walk to our room naked because its against the law. Wow...it's indescent exposure for being in your own home. This is why i HATE the police and government. That's a false arrest by far, and his lawyer has an open and shut case. Posted by: Michael at December 20, 2009 1:30 PM "Invasion of Privacy, Trespassing, Peeping Tom" Posted by: Richard at December 20, 2009 1:32 PM Everyone is missing the point, no one is saying you cannot be naked in your own house, but you should not be seen from the outside regardless. All you jailhouse lawyers need to get a grip, if you hate police you are obviously of questionable character in the first place. Posted by: anonymous at December 20, 2009 1:35 PM I am 65 years old. I have a 40 acre farm. I go out into my fields and into my forest if I want nude. This judge needs to talk to me. On my property, not in his courtroom. He is the kind of judge that will let a child rapist off, and put people in jail for what this man did, or if somebody smokes marijuna. Judge, send your best. They won't walk off of my property, they will crawl. You are an asshole. Posted by: jim caraway at December 20, 2009 1:53 PM nest time take a air rifle or something and blow her eyes off,so she stop peeping Posted by: abel at December 20, 2009 1:56 PM I understand if he was standing naked in front of an open window facing out on purpose, but if the guy just happened to be in his kitchen eating breakfast while naked, it's none of her business. And she should stay off his lawn. Posted by: Desiree at December 20, 2009 1:57 PM Is there a petition for nudity rights on your own property? Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 2:07 PM If he was near an open window, that's the only way I can see the woman's point of view, at least somewhat. She should not have been in his yard and she shouldn't be looking inside other people's houses. And to claim that he was trying to expose himself to her and her son is ridiculous because he was only trying to make coffee and perhaps didn't even realize that he had left the blinds/curtains open. And I'm also wondering, it doesnt say what time in the morning it was, but I don't know why that woman was taking her son for a walk in the morning, shouldn't be at school or at least heading for school? And even if she claims that she was walking her son to school, she still shouldn't be on his yard. Posted by: Ladan at December 20, 2009 2:15 PM Stupid person! We can do whatever we want in our homes! This country is going to hell! Posted by: MediaGuru at December 20, 2009 2:15 PM Stupid person! We can do whatever we want in our homes! This country is going to hell! Posted by: MediaGuru at December 20, 2009 2:16 PM WOMAN! Mind your own business!! Your home is your castle the one place you are suppose to feel safe, secure and free to be. He is hurting no one..Please do not make the one thing that we all deserve freedom to be takien away, especially in your own home. Innocent.......... Posted by: Iris at December 20, 2009 2:18 PM everyone seems to attacking the woman, whom granted should not of been walking in his yard however i have a question; Was this window facing the front or the back yard of his house and dare i ask was his curtian/bilds open? If yes then it IS his fault and he should be fined. it is no different than driving in my car topless for any innocent person to see and to take offense to. Posted by: Megan at December 20, 2009 2:27 PM you are right this Country is going to hell and it is because of liberal morons who have no morals like most people commenting on this article Posted by: media critic at December 20, 2009 2:34 PM I want to thank all of you - those involved in this fiasco and those of you with such great comments. I was really down in the dumps but you made me laugh so hard that tears ran down my face. The whole thing is sooo stupid. My grandchildren spent 3 weeks with me and while I miss them, I was happy that after they left I could once again run around the house communing with nature. Posted by: alice w lipovsky at December 20, 2009 2:36 PM Im naked right now. Posted by: George at December 20, 2009 2:52 PM Unless this guy has only one foot of front yard she was snooping on purpose. First thing I thought when I saw this was that she was related to a cop. Thanks for confirming, Brenda. I believe that police department should file a letter of reprimand into whomever's file it was that authorized this arrest. Lets face it. The woman in question obviously knew she could make this happen; a "normal" person wouldn't have to immediately call anyone to tell them about this. Some group should do an evaluation of the entire police dept's arrest records. I doubt this is an unusual case. Posted by: Cathy at December 20, 2009 3:02 PM People in their homes, should have the right to walked nude if they want to. Privacy act. Posted by: Virginia at December 20, 2009 3:13 PM If she was in HIS yard looking in HIS window then she deserve's to see what she see's Posted by: David Williams at December 20, 2009 3:16 PM If she was in HIS yard looking in HIS window then she deserve's to see what she see's Posted by: David Williams at December 20, 2009 3:17 PM First they go off talking about the letter of the law, but they forget to inforce the letter of the law on trespassing! execute equally or go back to the freakin nazi land you came from. Posted by: Ray at December 20, 2009 3:21 PM People do have the right to be nude if they want in their home, but when they can be seen from the front of the house it then becomes an issue. Imagine if you had kids riding their bike down the sidewalk and saw that. Posted by: anonymous at December 20, 2009 3:24 PM A lot of comments, a lot of passion here.We need to keep our personal rights or become a "police State". Keep your nose out of others business, learn to laugh and relax. It was probably the guys ex, or a girlfriend getting vengence. There are too many "what if's", but none excuse the woman from leering and then over reacting by calling the cops.He was probably cold besides. No harm no fowl, like an ill eagle in our country. Posted by: Steve at December 20, 2009 3:24 PM HARD TO BELEIVE THAT THE COPS WOULD BE SUCH IDIOTS AND ACTUALLY ARREST THIS GUY. YOU CAN ALWAYS JUST TAKE A REPORT AND HAVE THE PROSECUTING AGENCY REJECT IT..WERE THE COPS AND PROSECUTORS AND JUDGE WEARING TOWELS ON THEIR HEADS. SOUNDS LIKE SOMETHING FROM A FANATICAL MIDDLE EAST COUNTRY. Posted by: FRANK at December 20, 2009 3:27 PM @ Megan How was he supposed to know something was watching him?! Posted by: MediaGuru at December 20, 2009 3:35 PM she saw him naked before in his kitchen...and wanted to see him again...maybe he refused her...bet on it Posted by: Anonymous at December 20, 2009 3:43 PM It seems that since the woman was well a woman that things are going to be on her side. Posted by: Eryka at December 22, 2009 11:17 PM Post a comment |
links
hiphopmusic.com
Jamie-Lynn Sigler Split?
Brody Jenner Split Cell Phone Warnings Serena Williams: AP Athlete of the Year Venomous Dinosaur Discovered Priest: Shoplift and Say Amen! Alec Baldwin Butt Double? Randy Quaid Arrested! Secret Santa Recipients Must Pass Along the Kindness Secret Santas Would Rather Lose Every Dime Than Their Sense of Humor
inane asylum
Jamie-Lynn Sigler Split?
Brody Jenner Split Cell Phone Warnings Serena Williams: AP Athlete of the Year Venomous Dinosaur Discovered Priest: Shoplift and Say Amen! Alec Baldwin Butt Double? Randy Quaid Arrested! Secret Santa Recipients Must Pass Along the Kindness Secret Santas Would Rather Lose Every Dime Than Their Sense of Humor
Recent Videos
Jamie-Lynn Sigler Split? ---------------------------------------- Brody Jenner Split ---------------------------------------- Cell Phone Warnings ---------------------------------------- Serena Williams: AP Athlete of the Year ---------------------------------------- Venomous Dinosaur Discovered ---------------------------------------- Priest: Shoplift and Say Amen! ---------------------------------------- Alec Baldwin Butt Double? ---------------------------------------- Randy Quaid Arrested! ---------------------------------------- Secret Santa Recipients Must Pass Along the Kindness ---------------------------------------- Secret Santas Would Rather Lose Every Dime Than Their Sense of Humor ----------------------------------------
Weblog Archives
December 2009
November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 |